|
KEY ROLES
Underwriter
Reviews credit-worthiness of transaction
Structures financing and recommends best time to enter market
Oversees preparation of disclosure document
Purchases obligations from Issuer and resells to investors
Bond Counsel
Primary purpose is to issue opinion expressing that interest is tax-exempt
Ensures compliance with state and federal law
Helps structure financing
Trustee/Fiscal Agent
Banking institution which handles administrative functions and pays principal and interest to investors
In some instances, holds and disburses proceeds of the obligations
Rating Agency
If involved, reviews underlying credit of transaction
Assigns rating to obligations, which affects interest costs
Credit Enhancer
Highly rated entity
Risk Transference (e.g. lends its credit profile to the transaction in exchange for premium)
Insures the payment of debt service
KEY TERMS
Bond
The evidence of debt
Creates securities whereby an issuer agrees, by written contract, to pay a fixed principal sum on a specified date (maturity date) and at a specified rate of interest.
Pay-as-you-go:
A phrase that means that capital projects are being financed from current operating revenues or taxes rather than by borrowing.
Le•ver•age\N\
1: an inducing or compelling force
2: EFFECTIVENESS, POWER
3: the advantage gained by the use of a tool which provides benefit disproportionate to the energy or resources expended.
WHY DO PUBLIC AGENCIES USE TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING?
To benefit from their tax-exempt status
- Preserve their cash reserves for other purposes or projects;
ensure orderly expenditure of reserves
- Leverage financial assets, i.e. financing more capital projects
than expenditure of cash reserves or current receipts would support.
- Avoid “phased” financing approach often dictated by
pay-as-you-go alternative
- Debt/equity management, e.g. retention of equity implies financial flexibility & safeguards against financial exposure and uncertain events.
- Guarantees control over project since 100% funding is provided up-front.
- Asset/liability management, i.e. matching of short-term assets with short-term liabilities & long-term assets with long-term liabilities. Ideal match applies the receipt of a long term revenue source (e.g. assessments or rates and charges) against a long-term liability (e.g. debt service).
- Place burden of costs on all beneficiaries of improvements, not just current users
FINANCING VS. "PAY-AS-YOU-GO”
- Financing is more expensive
- Financing provides greater flexibility
- Ability to adjust repayment schedule
- Easier to undertake large projects
- Ability to adapt to changing needs
- Minimize risk of construction cost increases
GENERAL OBLICATION (G.O.) BONDS
- Most secure obligation
- Requires 2/3rds vote of electorate
- Used only to acquire or improve real property
- Secured by unlimited ad valorem property tax
Advantages of G.O. Bonds
Lowest interest cost
Provides previously unavailable source of revenues (won't detract from other sources available to issuer)
No debt service reserve fund requirement
Disadvantages of G.O. Bonds
Schedule - usually 6 to 9 months
Difficulty in obtaining 2/3rds vote
Limitations on use of proceeds
Non-flexible formula for levy - uniform percentage of assessed value
ASSESSMENT BONDS
- Secured by Special Assessment Levied on Property
- Property must receive special benefit from project
- Assessment levied in proportion to benefit received
- Not a Tax
- Generally used to finance infrastructure (e.g. roads, parks, sewer, h2o, streets and lights, drainage, other utilities)
- Requires Prop. 218 attention
MELLO-ROOS BONDS
- Secured by special tax annually levied by issuer
- No requirement of establishing special benefit to property
- No gross lien on property
- Greater flexibility in structuring and phasing projects, spread of tax over different types of property
- Generally used to finance certain services (e.g. fire, police, library, and recreational services)
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION(“COP's”)
- Financing based on power of District to lease or purchase property
- No voter approval required
- Need to review enabling legislation for appropriate powers
- Used to finance capital facilities
- Governing board approval only
- Well recognized in tax-exempt market
- Facilitates legal and debt service structuring
- Easily marketed - competitive rates
LEASE-BASED COPs
- Subject of the lease is either facility to be built or acquired, or an existing facility
- District leases facility or property to another entity (e.g. CSDA Finance Corporation), which leases completed project back to District
- Lease payments assigned to trustee, which issues certificates evidencing right to share in such payments
- Annual payments must equal fair rental value
- Annual payments are made from general fund and other legally available funds of District
- Payments abated if project not available for use (e.g. damaged by fire)
Lease-based COPs: Advantages
No voter approval
Quick time schedule
Flexible structure
Finance wide variety of capital improvements
(e.g. pipelines, buildings, reservoirs)
Generally available to all Districts
Generally not subject to acceleration
Lease-based COPs: Disadvantages
Facility is security for financing and subject to encumbrance
Abatement risk usually requires rental interruption insurance
Requires capitalized interest until project completed
REVENUE -BASED COPs
Used to finance facilities related to revenue producing enterprises (e.g. water or sewer systems)
Repayment limited to specific enterprise revenues
Revenue-based COPs: Advantages
No lien on non-enterprise revenues
Secured by rates and charges of enterprise
Generally considered very secure credit
Used for a wide variety of facilities
Generally viewed as a revenue bond without the necessity of a vote
No capitalized interest required
Revenue-based COPs: Disadvantages
District obligated to raise rates and charges if revenue is insufficient
No abatement
Requires coverage factor of 1.10x – 1.25x
Limitations on issuance of additional debt
Not available to certain agencies because of debt limits in enabling legislation
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
- Source of debt repayment
- Existing users
- ates, charges, fees
- Future users
- connection fees, hook-up fees, assessments
- Mix of existing & future users
- all rates, charges, fees, connections and hook-up fees
- Direct beneficiaries
- All properties
- Property Taxes
- Debt Capacity (i.e ability to assume annual debt service obligation)
- Context & perspective (i.e. consider the future plans of the District)
Please click here to apply for a quote. |